ERM is powerful when designed as a performance-focused activity. It's not an audit, nor a compliance process. ERM manages the barriers that prevent organizations from achieving their objectives.

Author:
Richard Wilson develops Performance Risk Management capabilities for complex organizations. He has helped the largest companies in North America manage the barriers to their desired performance.

richard.m.wilson@ca.pwc.com | (416) 941-8374

Sunday, May 27, 2012

ERM Challenge Series: #8: Isolating your Top Risks; Most Top 10 Risks are Not the Risks to Address

ERM Challenge #8: Isolating your Top Risks; Most Top 10 Risks are Not the Risks to Address

ERM Objective:
Allocate resources to the correct risks based upon strategic priorities.


The Trap:
After completing your risk assessment you will have a prioritized risk register, typically using Impact and Likelihood criteria. Many firms then focus on the Top 10, 5, or even 3 risks on the list. The issue is that your Top 10 risks are typically not the most important risks to address. The third key question has not been answered, which is, “Which risks should we manage differently than we do today?”. Not answering this third question potential causes you to apply more resources to the incorrect risks.


The Solution:
Determine Risk Tolerances:


After your risk assessment, set a target level for each risk (a tolerance). This determines where the risk needs to be on the Impact and likelihood scales. You can now give the risk owner a clearer idea of what the risk looks like when successfully managed (within tolerance). You will also clarify if you are reducing the likelihood, impact, or both (and why?).

In my experience, 40-60% of risks in the Top 10 list do not require additional mitigations.

About The Author

My photo
Richard is a Director in PwC's Risk Advisory practice with clients in both Canada and the United States.

He is an experienced senior executive with 15 years in a CEO or COO role (publically traded and private firms). Richard has been leading risk management implementations for more than a decade incl. 60 C-level risk assessments, and has led online risk assessments for 30,000 people in 25 countries.

He has advised the largest company in the US on risk management, and he has facilitated a risk assessment for the United Nations. Richard has been published in Compliance Week, Canadian Business, and the Globe & Mail and has been a keynote speaker on the topic of risk at many conferences in both Canada and the US since 2004.